Effect of Salts and Organic Osmolytes is Due to Conservative Forces

Main Article Content

Ikechukwu I. Udema


Background: The impression given in the literature was that the net interaction potential energy, V is the difference between Coulombic-Coulombic and total weaker interaction energies. It is proposed however, that in aqueous solution all particles with full formal charges and partial charge (dipoles) contribute to the total interaction as applicable to conservative field but not to the exclusion of hydrophobic interaction if applicable.

Objectives: The objectives are 1) To theoretically elucidate the basis of the intermolecular interaction, 2) To show that effectiveness of an osmolyte which may include inorganic ion to force macromolecular, (un)folding, the m-value, is a function of the implicit mobility (or translational velocity) of the cosolute, 3) To link the m-value to conservative forces (or potential energies, V) and 4) Quantitate the values of V.

Methods: A major theoretical investigation and experimentation using Bernfeld method.

Results and Discussion: There were higher velocities of amylolysis with salt than without it in the presence of ethanol. The magnitude of the calculated V and energy equivalent of the entropic term were higher with higher concentration of ethanol unlike was the case with graphically determined values which were generally higher in magnitude than calculated values. The values of the calculated V and intermolecular distance were respectively higher in magnitude and longer with higher concentration of the salt.

Conclusion: The attractive interaction between a macromolecule and a cationic counter ion is due to long ranged ion-ion interaction which ultimately enhances the effect of short ranged interaction. Higher salt concentration promotes long ranged interaction. The translational velocity of the solvent and cosolute has a role in the quantification of intermolecular distance. A mathematical relationship exists between m-value and - V (or 2 K.E.). The values of V can be calculated based on the derived equations.

Interaction potential energies, conservative field forces, m-values, porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase, ethanol, calcium chloride.

Article Details

How to Cite
Udema, I. I. (2020). Effect of Salts and Organic Osmolytes is Due to Conservative Forces. Asian Journal of Applied Chemistry Research, 5(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajacr/2020/v5i130123
Original Research Article


Timasheff SN. Protein solvent preferential interaction, protein hydration and the modulation of biochemical reactions by solvent components. Biochemistry. 2002; 99(15):9721-9726.

Rösgen J, Pettit MB, Bolen DW. Protein folding, stability and solvation structure in osmolyte solution. Biophys. J. 2005;89: 2988–2997.

Baldwin RL. How Hofmeister ion interactions affect protein stability. Biophys J. 1996;71:2056-2063.

Balos V, Boon M, Hunger J. Anionic and cationic Hofmeister effects are non-additive for guanidinium salts. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017;19:9724-9728.

Arakawa T, Timasheff SN. Mechanism of protein’s salting-in and salting-out by divalent salts: Balance between hydration and salt binding. Biochemistry. 1984; 23(25):5912-5923.

Abdelaziz B, Messaoud H. Thermodynamic models: Application to the brines of chotts in Algerian North-Eastern Sahara. J. Thermodyn. Catal. 2016;7(4): 1-6.

Ramasubbu N, Paloth V, Luo Y, Brayer GD, Levine MJ. Structure of human salivary alpha amylase at 1.6 Å resolution: Implication for its role in the oral cavity. Acta Crysta. 1996;D52:435-446.

Jeong-Bin Y, Choi SH, Lee TH, Jang MU, Park JM, Yi AR, Svensson B, Kim TJ. Effects of calcium ion concentration on starch hydrolysis of barley α-amylase isozymes. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008; 18(4):730–734.

Hertadi R, Widhyastuti H. Effects of calcium ion to the activity and stability of lipase isolated from Chromohalobacter japonicus BK-AB18. Procedia Chem. 2015; 16:306-313.

Kumari A, Rosenkranz T, Kayastha AM, Fitter J. The effect of calcium binding on the unfolding barrier: A kinetic study on homologous α-amylases. Biophys. Chem. 2010;151:54–60.

Lund M. Electrostatic interactions in and between biomolecules. Lund University. Ph.D Thesis; 2006.

Kirkwood JG, Buff FP. The statistical mechanical theory of solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 1951;19:774–777.

Evens TJ, Niedz RP. Are Hofmeister series relevant to modern ion-specific effects research? Sch. Res. Exch. 2008;1-9.

Rösgen JB, Pettitt M, Bolen DW. An analysis of the molecular origin of osmolyte-dependent protein stability. Protein Sci. 2007;16:733-743.

Levitt M, Sharon R. Accurate simulation of protein dynamics in solution. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1988;85:7557- 7561.

Trevino SR, Scholtz MJ, Pace N. Measuring and increasing protein solubility. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008;97(10): 4155-4166.

Pace CN, Grimsley GR, Schltz JM. Protein ionisable groups: pK Values and their contribution to protein stability and solubility. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284(20): 13285-13289.

Buisson G, Duee E, Haser R, Payan F. Three dimensional structure of porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase at 2.9 A resolution. Role of calcium in structure and activity. EMBO J. 1987;6(13):3909- 3916.

Jönsson B, Lund M, daSilva FLB. Electrostatics in macromolecular solution. In Electrostatic interactions in and between biomolecules. Lund University Ph.D Thesis; 2007.

On the Complexation of Proteins and Polyelectrolytes da Silva FLB, Lund M, Jönsson B, Akesson T. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110:4459-4464.

Stefani M. Protein misfolding and aggregation: New examples in medicine and biology of the dark side of the protein world. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2004;1739:5-25.

Chari R, Jerath K, Badkar AV, Kalonia DS. Long-and short-range electrostatic interac-tions affect the rheology of highly concen-trated antibody solutions Pharm. Res. 2009;26(12);2607–2618.

Levine IN. Physical chemistry Peterson, KA, Oberbroeckling SR. (Eds) 5th Ed. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY10020. 2002;299-303.

Lund M, Jönsson B. Electrostatic interactions between proteins in a salt solution - A Monte Carlo simulation study. In Electrostatic interactions in and between biomolecules. Lund University Ph.D Thesis; 2006.

Bersani AM. Dell’Acqua G. Is there anything left to say on enzyme kinetic constants and quasi-steady-state approximation? J. Math. Chem. 2012;50: 335–344.

Reddy AS, Sastry GN. Cation [M = H+, Li+, Na+, K+,Ca^(2+), Mg2+, NH_4^+, and NMe_4^+] Interactions with the Aromatic Motifs of Naturally Occurring Amino Acids: A theoretical study. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2005; 109(39):8893–8903.

Hebert EJ, Grimsley GR, Hartley RW, Horn G, Schell D, Garcia S, Both V, Sevcik J, Pace CN. Purification of ribonucleases Sa, Sa2, and Sa3 after expression in Escherichia coli. Protein Express. Purificat. 1997;11:162–168.

Shaw KL, Grimsley GR, Yakovlev GI, Makarov AA, Pace N. The effect of net charge on the solubility, activity and stability of ribonuclease Sa. Protein Sci. 2001;10:1206–1215.

Reuvenia S, Urbakhc M, Klafterc J. Role of substrate unbinding in Michaelis–Menten enzymatic reactions Biophys. Comput. Biol. 2014;111(12):4391–4396.

Udema II, Onigbinde AO. Activity coefficient of solution components and salts as special osmolyte from Kirkwood-Buff theoretical perspective. Asian J. Res. Biochem. 2019;4(3):1-20.

Kumar V, Dixit N, Zhou LL. Impact of short range hydrophobic interactions and long range electrostatic forces on the aggregation kinetics of a monoclonal antibody and a dual-variable domain immunoglobulin at low and high concentrations. In J. Pharm. 2011;421(1): 82–93.

Udema II. The key to effective catalytic action is pre-catalytic site activity preceding enzyme-substrate complex formation. Adv. Res. 2017;9(3):1-12.

Udema II, Onigbinde AO. The state of proteins notwithstanding, translational velocity is vital for their function. Asian J. Res. Biochem. 2019;5(3):1-17.

Udema II. Determination of translational velocity of reaction mixture components: Effect on the rate of reaction. Adv. Biochem. 2016;4(6):84-93.

Marcus Y. Thermodynamics of solvation of ions. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1991; 87(18):2995-2999.

Marcelo L, Holthauzen F, Bolen DW. Mixed osmolytes: The degree to which one osmolyte affects the protein stabilizing ability of another. Protein Sci. 2007;16: 293-298.

Harries D, Rösgen J. Use of macroscopic properties of solution to derive microscope structural information. Methods Cell Biol.2008;84:680-730.

Rösgen JB, Pettitt M, Bolen, DW. An analysis of the molecular origin of osmolyte-dependent protein stability. Protein Sci. 2007;16:733-743.

Fitter J. A measure of conformational entropy change during thermal protein unfolding using neutron spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 2003;84:3924-3930.

Bernfeld P. Amylases, alpha and beta. Methods Enzymol. 1955;1:149–152.

Baskakov I, Bolen DW. Forcing thermo-dynamically unfolded proteins to fold (communication). J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273(9):1-5.

Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the means and variance from the median range and the size of a sample. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2005; 5(13):1-10.

Schurr JM. The role of diffusion in bimolecular solution kinetics – Paper 1. Biophys. J. 1970;10:700-716.

Schurr JM. The role of diffusion in enzyme kinetics – Paper 2. Biophys J. 1970;10: 717-727.

Sky-Peck HH, Thuvasethakul P. Human pancreatic alpha-amylase. II. Effects of pH, substrate and ions on the activity of the enzyme. Annals Clin. Lab. Sci. 1977; 7(4):310-317.